<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s really the problem with Sin?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/</link>
	<description>Revelation in Progess</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 01:03:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof F. Morris</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/comment-page-1/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof F. Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/#comment-347</guid>
		<description>Well, if you read through all the muck I proposed, you&#039;d see that there&#039;s a way that the church has already decided that a break is okay, in contravention of canon law.

But maybe Wesley should have just come back in one year.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you read through all the muck I proposed, you&#8217;d see that there&#8217;s a way that the church has already decided that a break is okay, in contravention of canon law.</p>
<p>But maybe Wesley should have just come back in one year.  <img src='http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnotherCoward</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>AnotherCoward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 06:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/#comment-346</guid>
		<description>I believe canon law is written such that you&#039;ve got to have an undeniable reason for ordaining a bishop without 3 bishops present.  And then, you should use 2 bishops; only exception being that you&#039;ve got an undeniable reason for not having 2 bishops; and then you have to have one bishop.  And if you don&#039;t have one bishop ... then NO NEW BISHOP FOR YOU!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe canon law is written such that you&#8217;ve got to have an undeniable reason for ordaining a bishop without 3 bishops present.  And then, you should use 2 bishops; only exception being that you&#8217;ve got an undeniable reason for not having 2 bishops; and then you have to have one bishop.  And if you don&#8217;t have one bishop &#8230; then NO NEW BISHOP FOR YOU!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/#comment-345</guid>
		<description>Yeah, only bishops are allowed to confer any of the 3 levels of &#039;Holy Orders&#039; (deacon, priest, bishop), and traditionally, only the Pope (the bishop of Rome) does the later, though I believe 3 bishops can ordain a new one... hrm...[1] But Spencer is right, if Wesley was only a Catholic priest, he can not legitimatly name new priests or bishops (or even deacons).

[1] this one is fuzzy... I know 3 bishops showed up for the instalation of ArchBishop Gregory in Atlanta almost a year ago...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, only bishops are allowed to confer any of the 3 levels of &#8216;Holy Orders&#8217; (deacon, priest, bishop), and traditionally, only the Pope (the bishop of Rome) does the later, though I believe 3 bishops can ordain a new one&#8230; hrm&#8230;[1] But Spencer is right, if Wesley was only a Catholic priest, he can not legitimatly name new priests or bishops (or even deacons).</p>
<p>[1] this one is fuzzy&#8230; I know 3 bishops showed up for the instalation of ArchBishop Gregory in Atlanta almost a year ago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imperfect Mirror</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Imperfect Mirror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/#comment-344</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Methodist Apostolic Succession&lt;/strong&gt;

	I was joking with Jason and Spencer about Jason wondering if it was a sin for him to host his Weblog on [rocksmyfaceoff.net]; I joked that it would only be a venial sin to give me money.  [And actually, while I do tithe, I don&#8217;t consider the .ne...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Methodist Apostolic Succession</strong></p>
<p>	I was joking with Jason and Spencer about Jason wondering if it was a sin for him to host his Weblog on [rocksmyfaceoff.net]; I joked that it would only be a venial sin to give me money.  [And actually, while I do tithe, I don&#8217;t consider the .ne&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof F. Morris</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof F. Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/#comment-343</guid>
		<description>Huh.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostolic_succession#Apostolicity_as_episcopal_continuity&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I went and did more reading in Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt;, and I found that the Council on Bishops says we don&#039;t have it.  Funny, &lt;a href=&quot;http://imperfectmirror.org/2005/05/07/what-im-looking-for/#comment-51&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;because I&#039;ve read many&lt;/a&gt;---&lt;a href=&quot;http://revneal.org/Writings/apostoli.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Greg Neal chief among them&lt;/a&gt;---who argue that we do.  But yes, Wesley was never a bishop, so if your argument is that you have to pass it through the bishops, I won&#039;t argue the point.

Now I have a new entry for today!  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostolic_succession#Apostolicity_as_episcopal_continuity" rel="nofollow">I went and did more reading in Wikipedia</a>, and I found that the Council on Bishops says we don&#8217;t have it.  Funny, <a href="http://imperfectmirror.org/2005/05/07/what-im-looking-for/#comment-51" rel="nofollow">because I&#8217;ve read many</a>&#8212;<a href="http://revneal.org/Writings/apostoli.htm" rel="nofollow">Greg Neal chief among them</a>&#8212;who argue that we do.  But yes, Wesley was never a bishop, so if your argument is that you have to pass it through the bishops, I won&#8217;t argue the point.</p>
<p>Now I have a new entry for today!  <img src='http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof F. Morris</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof F. Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/#comment-342</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wesley#Ordination_of_ministers&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I&#039;ll let Wikipedia elaborate&lt;/a&gt;.  I don&#039;t expect you two to agree.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wesley#Ordination_of_ministers" rel="nofollow">I&#8217;ll let Wikipedia elaborate</a>.  I don&#8217;t expect you two to agree.  <img src='http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AC</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>AC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/#comment-339</guid>
		<description>??

I thought Wesley was only a Priest in the Church of England.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>??</p>
<p>I thought Wesley was only a Priest in the Church of England.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof F. Morris</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof F. Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Yes, I tithe.

But hey ... we have apostolic succession!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I tithe.</p>
<p>But hey &#8230; we have apostolic succession!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/#comment-337</guid>
		<description>ahh... but will you tithe off of it... giving to a Methodist might not be a sin at all... however, if he&#039;ll give it to the Methodist church...  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahh&#8230; but will you tithe off of it&#8230; giving to a Methodist might not be a sin at all&#8230; however, if he&#8217;ll give it to the Methodist church&#8230;  <img src='http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof F. Morris</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof F. Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/ac/archives/2005/12/11/whats-really-the-problem-with-sin/#comment-336</guid>
		<description>My slices come cheap.  Giving your money to a Methodist is probably only a venial sin anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My slices come cheap.  Giving your money to a Methodist is probably only a venial sin anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

