Archive for April, 2008

serendipity.

Monday, April 28th, 2008

Yesterday, quite by accident, I discovered a Thomas Merton book that I forgot that I ever bought it.

It’s not really a big deal, it’s just a little paperback that has some of his drawings and some prayers from his journals. It’s probably not of interest to anyone but a nerd like me.

But that’s not so much the point.

The point it is, I opened it and read a bit. What I found was something that I have forgotten to have existed.

The faith I found Merton engaging was something more genuine than I’ve been seeing.

I’ve been mistrusting of faith lately. I’m afraid of engaging anyone’s ideas, because they all feel like a trap. It feels like they’re luring in me, telling me that if I accept this set of propositions, then I must become as they think I should be. It feels like a trap for them to tell me that I should stop drinking beer, find a nice girlfriend, and start voting Republican.

When I read Merton, I didn’t see any of that stuff. Merton’s faith, it looks like to me, it willing to let people be people on their own terms. His faith isn’t forcing people into some arbitrary mold of what people should be.

There is room in Merton’s faith for the other, it seems.

That’s a big deal.

sure it is kid, winners cut bait.

Thursday, April 24th, 2008

with my mind filled with everyone else’s thoughts, i try to find a space that is my own.
most days i’m not even sure why.
when i try to be quiet and find what lies beneath a surface constantly plugged into headphones and televisions, i find that there is not much there.
i consume much, but i exist as very little.
i think very little.
i am affected by very little.
i chew over very little.
instead i devour it. i gnash at it and swallow it and rid myself of its presence.
and after the gnashing of teeth i do not think of it again.
i continue as i always have.
i go as i am pushed.
i follow as i am led.
i take in everything and am transformed by nothing.
i wondered if i have peddled away the most important parts of me for things that collect dust on shelves.
i wonder if i am that man who forfeited what he truly was to get a little piece of what could never do him any good anyway.

is it different now? now that i’m older?
at this place where i’ve got the problem of knowledge without the wisdom of age?
where cynicism has misplaced youthful ideas but is not yet tempered significant reflection?

it feels some days like those people who had it so much worse might just have had it so much better.
they may have died at 45 and only bathed on holidays, but they were freer.
they could retreat beyond this cacophony that is constant connection.
they had no cellular cords to cut.
they did no battle with the constant din of targeted marketing.
the work of their hands was the sustenance of their life.
and it was hard, but i wonder if it was not good.

is it any consequence that all that is billed as the stuff that will make our lives better
is the stuff that makes piles and piles and dollars?
and the stuff that has no place in the “free” market is the stuff that generates no revenue for anyone?
is that just coincidence?
am i just a madman? Ranting about conspiracies to capitalize on the human search for happiness and belonging? is that who i am?
am i crazy to question the assumptions of this thing we’ve built? crazy to wonder if progress is good? crazy to wonder if the american dream only exists in the minds of the people who are selling it? crazy to imagine how life would be if we did it differently?
am i crazy to wonder what life is like in a sphere where i can question the fundamental assumptions?
crazy to think that questioning power is less my right and more my duty?
am i crazy to re-imagine life and wealth and power?
am i crazy to question the cult of marriage and its millions of dollars?
am i crazy to question the cult of children and its million dollars?
am i crazy to laugh at all of these notions of success that shackle us to things that we never wanted anyway for the sake of a life that cannot make us happy?

who knows. maybe i am.

punk rock’s dead.

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

Last night when I couldn’t sleep, I lay in bed, staring at the ceiling and getting all tangled up in my sheets, and I started, as I usually do, thinking.

For no particular reason (or maybe for a very particular reason, who can ever tell?) I started thinking about all this religion stuff that has been rolling around inside my brain lately, but has yet to find a home in anything very concrete, and, in that weird state between puzzling something out and wishing like hell I would fall asleep, I assigned myself with the thought experiment of creating a church. Normally, the things I think in that space just before sleep really are ephemeral, and they disappear. Something about this stuck.

I started with a desire to peel away all pretense. I thought that was essential. Any church I was going to start would be, from the beginning, completely devoid of grandstanding and production value. Those things are entertaining, but I have trouble finding them authentic. That, I thought, would no doubt be the mood of things.

So in that mood of utter lack of pretense, what sorts of things would we be about? Why would we even be undertaking the project in the first place? I came up with (something like) this: we would acknowledge that we are utterly broken people living in an utterly broken world attempting to join with God in his work of fixing that world as revealed in the person of Jesus.

That seemed to say it all. It puts the focus where it should be: on the person of Jesus. It allows to move away from and past all of the truly disgusting baggage of Christianity and focus on an authentic telling of the story of who Jesus was, and how that story should effect our lives. From the start it acknowledges our former and perpetual brokenness, and places that brokenness in the context of a world that is also broken. It looks to be something that can serve as a foundation for a new kind life spent imitating the revelation of God in Jesus, while being cultivated in such a way that it takes a step back from all of the baggage of Christianity that alienates people from the message of Jesus.

We would have to acknowledge that our recovery from this brokenness is a slow process. While some people (even people in the Bible) may have experienced miraculous, instant conversions, we will probably not. We will acknowledge that our transformation happens so slowly, and it such odd, stumbling increments that we may not even recognize that it is happening at all, but our situation in a community of like-minded individuals will ensure that, even when we cannot see how we are changing, the people around us are constantly helping us to become something more like Jesus.

Such a view of transformation will ensure that we value our honesty. It will ensure that this slow process of transformation is not something that be envied, and that those who struggle with even the most elementary principles of the conversion will absolutely not be alienated because they struggle and freely admit those struggles. We will freely admit that we are small-minded, mean, vindictive. We will be honest about our drunkenness, our laziness, our pride. We will stare down the strange animals of our sexuality, admit that part of being exists, and be committed to the work of transforming that essential part of our humanity.

We will be people who acknowledge that we are full of mixed emotions and desires. We will not treat belief as some sacred cow, but we will readily acknowledge that some days we just don’t really think that any of this is true. We will not pretend that we have some fierce love for a God that is impossible to understand. We will admit the ready impossibility of having a relationship with something that is ineffable, and readily embrace all of the difficulties that entails. We will admit that, most days, we stare out into the distance to find the “something more” that we have always been told exist, and that we see only blackness. We will admit that we search our hearts to find some stirring of a fire that we have been told should be there, but instead, we feel only blackness. We will search our minds to find the things that should exist and infallible proof that some being exists, and we will find only more questions. We will not be afraid of using the hard words or facing the hard emotions. We will back down from no intellectual or experiential challenge about faith, especially when those words, challenges, and emotions exist in our own hearts. Yet, we will be utterly committed to the transformative work that we set out to participate in from the start.

In that way, we will be free. We will be free from others’ expectations of our faith, and we will be free from our own expectations of our faith, allowing ourselves to be transformed by our willingness to release all of the things that we take for granted.

Dare we? Even in the place between wake and sleep when the rules of reality have less constraints over our minds, dare we imagine such a thing? Dare we re-imagine the things that become the formative narratives for our lives? Dare we be bold enough to commit to such an incredibly messy project? Dare we commit to each other and throw our lives together in a way that acknowledges that we’re better to go down together, since we’re certainly going down apart? Dare we be bold enough to offer the realities of our very dearest selves to people that we know we can trust with our very lives?

I don’t know.

Dare we?