<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Narnia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2005/10/25/narnia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2005/10/25/narnia/</link>
	<description>seeing the glory of God in the ordinary things of life</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barb</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2005/10/25/narnia/#comment-526</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 03:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2005/10/25/narnia/#comment-526</guid>
		<description>I tried to post to this the other day but it wouldn't publish. I'll try again...

I agree that the effects are kinda disappointing, but I'll bet that I stop noticing pretty quickly once the movie get's going. I'm sooo looking forward to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to post to this the other day but it wouldn&#8217;t publish. I&#8217;ll try again&#8230;</p>
<p>I agree that the effects are kinda disappointing, but I&#8217;ll bet that I stop noticing pretty quickly once the movie get&#8217;s going. I&#8217;m sooo looking forward to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2005/10/25/narnia/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2005/10/25/narnia/#comment-498</guid>
		<description>I don't know about 'well done'.  Maaaaaybe acceptable.  But it really just doesn't look right, and I don't think it ever will.  I think its better fit for our imaginations.

But I don't think I'll hold that against the movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about &#8216;well done&#8217;.  Maaaaaybe acceptable.  But it really just doesn&#8217;t look right, and I don&#8217;t think it ever will.  I think its better fit for our imaginations.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll hold that against the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaines</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2005/10/25/narnia/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2005/10/25/narnia/#comment-497</guid>
		<description>Yup, Liam Neeson as Aslan is just not working for me, at least from the preview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, Liam Neeson as Aslan is just not working for me, at least from the preview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krazy Celtic</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2005/10/25/narnia/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Krazy Celtic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 21:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2005/10/25/narnia/#comment-495</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link! I thought the talking animals were well done, except Aslan's voice and the griffin's voice did not match their characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link! I thought the talking animals were well done, except Aslan&#8217;s voice and the griffin&#8217;s voice did not match their characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
