<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choose Wisely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2007/07/31/1828/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2007/07/31/1828/</link>
	<description>seeing the glory of God in the ordinary things of life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2007/07/31/1828/comment-page-1/#comment-10620</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2007/07/31/1828/#comment-10620</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I agree.  I often comes up in these debates that literal six day creationists cast anyone that disagrees with them to hell, but that really isn&#039;t the case.  In fact, I&#039;ve only seen one example of this, and it was a whacked out, ugly website that said it.  It wasn&#039;t any of the popular voices of creationism (Answers in Genesis, Creation Research Instituted, or even Kent Hovind (as much as I disagree with his stuff)), or biblical exegetes.  Just some schmoe on the interwebz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree.  I often comes up in these debates that literal six day creationists cast anyone that disagrees with them to hell, but that really isn&#8217;t the case.  In fact, I&#8217;ve only seen one example of this, and it was a whacked out, ugly website that said it.  It wasn&#8217;t any of the popular voices of creationism (Answers in Genesis, Creation Research Instituted, or even Kent Hovind (as much as I disagree with his stuff)), or biblical exegetes.  Just some schmoe on the interwebz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2007/07/31/1828/comment-page-1/#comment-10618</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 01:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2007/07/31/1828/#comment-10618</guid>
		<description>Great post, although I think you were a bit hard on the geocentric theory. ;) I can totally agree that a person may reject a literal six day creation and still be an orthodox Christian. Witness the Hodges and Warfield. However, I don&#039;t think that such a one can be &lt;i&gt;totally&lt;/i&gt; consistent in his or her beliefs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, although I think you were a bit hard on the geocentric theory. <img src='http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I can totally agree that a person may reject a literal six day creation and still be an orthodox Christian. Witness the Hodges and Warfield. However, I don&#8217;t think that such a one can be <i>totally</i> consistent in his or her beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

