<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Computer!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2009/06/01/new-computer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2009/06/01/new-computer/</link>
	<description>seeing the glory of God in the ordinary things of life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2009/06/01/new-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-14339</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/?p=2063#comment-14339</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t built on the 3rd, and it definitely didn&#039;t ship on the 3rd.  Or the 4th.  Probably not the 5th, according to the sales rep I chatted with this morning.  So I guess I should set my sights on next Friday, and be happy if it gets here before then.

I did get the monitor though... it is a BEAST.  i&#039;ll have to post a photo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t built on the 3rd, and it definitely didn&#8217;t ship on the 3rd.  Or the 4th.  Probably not the 5th, according to the sales rep I chatted with this morning.  So I guess I should set my sights on next Friday, and be happy if it gets here before then.</p>
<p>I did get the monitor though&#8230; it is a BEAST.  i&#8217;ll have to post a photo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2009/06/01/new-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-14336</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/?p=2063#comment-14336</guid>
		<description>Well, hopefully I won&#039;t notice anything being slower!  My laptop is 1.7 GHz, and is maxed out at 1gb ram.  So even a single core 2.5GHz should run circles around it... using the the other three I can just consider bonus. :)

Another plus for the PC is the Windows software I&#039;ve purchased and use regularly... I&#039;d either have to buy (or find something free) something else for the mac, install windows on the mac and have to reboot every time I wanted to use it, or buy parallels or VMware to run them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, hopefully I won&#8217;t notice anything being slower!  My laptop is 1.7 GHz, and is maxed out at 1gb ram.  So even a single core 2.5GHz should run circles around it&#8230; using the the other three I can just consider bonus. <img src='http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Another plus for the PC is the Windows software I&#8217;ve purchased and use regularly&#8230; I&#8217;d either have to buy (or find something free) something else for the mac, install windows on the mac and have to reboot every time I wanted to use it, or buy parallels or VMware to run them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Winckler</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2009/06/01/new-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-14335</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Winckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/?p=2063#comment-14335</guid>
		<description>Does *happiness* have a price tag? You should have gotten the Mac. :D

Still, congrats! Looks like a monster of a computer. I must say, though, I&#039;ve been disappointed with multi-core CPUs to date. Most of my day-to-day software isn&#039;t yet written to take full advantage of them...so when work &quot;upgraded&quot; my 3.2 GHz single-core machine for a dual-core 2.7, I noticed some stuff was actually slower. Hopefully that&#039;s a problem that will continue to go away, though, as software adjusts to the world of multiple cores...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does *happiness* have a price tag? You should have gotten the Mac. <img src='http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Still, congrats! Looks like a monster of a computer. I must say, though, I&#8217;ve been disappointed with multi-core CPUs to date. Most of my day-to-day software isn&#8217;t yet written to take full advantage of them&#8230;so when work &#8220;upgraded&#8221; my 3.2 GHz single-core machine for a dual-core 2.7, I noticed some stuff was actually slower. Hopefully that&#8217;s a problem that will continue to go away, though, as software adjusts to the world of multiple cores&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2009/06/01/new-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-14334</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/?p=2063#comment-14334</guid>
		<description>In the very least, I won&#039;t become one of those horrible Mac fanboys that always say &#039;You should have gotten the Mac&#039; ;)

I got 6gb of ram compared to 4 w/ the iMac
blu-ray drive
tv tuner &amp; PVR software
wireless keyboard &amp; mouse

Those things would have cost another $500-600 in addition to the iMac pricetag.  I also got a separate video card w/ 256mb of memory... that would have been a $300 increase in the iMac cost (though, granted, that would also include a 2.97GHz Core 2 Duo processor (what I got is a slower clockspeed, but quad core).

Also, while the idea of an all-in-one computer really appeals to me, I&#039;m glad to have a separate monitor (w/ multiple HDMI inputs.. also a bonus!) that I&#039;ll be able to reuse (either as a monitor again, or just a hdtv) in another 4-5 years if/when this system can&#039;t keep up anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the very least, I won&#8217;t become one of those horrible Mac fanboys that always say &#8216;You should have gotten the Mac&#8217; <img src='http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I got 6gb of ram compared to 4 w/ the iMac<br />
blu-ray drive<br />
tv tuner &#038; PVR software<br />
wireless keyboard &#038; mouse</p>
<p>Those things would have cost another $500-600 in addition to the iMac pricetag.  I also got a separate video card w/ 256mb of memory&#8230; that would have been a $300 increase in the iMac cost (though, granted, that would also include a 2.97GHz Core 2 Duo processor (what I got is a slower clockspeed, but quad core).</p>
<p>Also, while the idea of an all-in-one computer really appeals to me, I&#8217;m glad to have a separate monitor (w/ multiple HDMI inputs.. also a bonus!) that I&#8217;ll be able to reuse (either as a monitor again, or just a hdtv) in another 4-5 years if/when this system can&#8217;t keep up anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Eubanks</title>
		<link>http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/2009/06/01/new-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-14333</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Eubanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rmfo-blogs.com/richard/?p=2063#comment-14333</guid>
		<description>You should have gotten the Mac.

I&#039;m curious: what hundreds of dollars of things came with this beast that pushed you over the edge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should have gotten the Mac.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious: what hundreds of dollars of things came with this beast that pushed you over the edge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

