don’t pretend to speak for me
at lunch i usually read different news sites to keep up with world events since i don’t get a newspaper at home. the internet is a wonderful thing in that regard. while reading, i came across this article on foxnews.com. i don’t pretend to be one of those people who read fox news and treat it as the only truth out there. but i was disturbed at what the article was about. i have posted about rock the vote being misleading before. they try to get rock stars to tell you how to vote. well apparently in this case, rock the vote is trying to get you how to think. the lead off, i do not think social security will be there for me when i retire. even if its revamped, i’m not going to count on it, which is why i put money toward the 401k at work, etc. the new plan by bush to open up private accounts for people instead of traditional social security, i can’t say i find a problem with it. why not try it? at least from my point of view, i’m not counting on it anyway, so what the hell? obviously the system is not going to run forever, and i believe in more self sufficiency the better. if i had more control over my money rather than “SS Tax” on my paycheck, i’d be cool with that. and since the reform includes not just taking the money, but putting it into a program of government funds, i think its a pretty good idea. if you read about the funds that are options you can see that none of them really suck. bush said at the state of the union that the reform would benefit the people my age the most obviously since we would have more time to put money in the new funds. the people like my parents would not see their benefits changed in any way. however, special interest lobbyists like AARP are railing against the new plan for obvious reasons. they are one of the most powerful lobbyists in the country, and they represent the older population who are obviously afraid of change, even if they are told that nothing will change. now today after reading the article on rock the vote’s view on social security, i can’t say i’m surprised. they have an obvious democratic lean, but they veil it in “we’re out for the young people.” right. anyway, the article i read today talked about how RTV’s survey steered the person answering to the conclusion they wanted, that young people think social security reform is wrong. in the article on RTV’s site they even say
70 percent would oppose private accounts if it meant “cuts to your guaranteed benefits would be so severe that you could not make up the difference with money from your private account.
of course you’re going to be against something if it means hurting you in other ways. i’m not going to support clemson to victory in a football game if that means my car gets stolen. that’s basically what the foxnews article said. what if the reform works? they apparently didn’t give the survey that option. so there was no question asking “would you support private accounts if your private account resulted in more money for your retirement?” of course someone would say “YES!” but that would not be in line with what RTV wanted to hear. instead of asking “do you support private accounts?” they asked “would you support them if that meant your benefits would be cut?” the benefits are going to be cut, that money is going to be in your private account! can’t they just ask the question and move on? instead they asked questions, phrased them a certain way to get their outcome. its sad when someone has to resort to lying to get their point across. MTV won’t tell you that RTV is screwed up. they were too busy giving out trips to the video music awards in exchange for registering to vote during their 20 million loud campaign. RTV knows they asked loaded questions, and yet they try to proclaim themselves as the voice of a generation. it makes me sick. do they think everyone under 30 is a mindless sheep not able to read between the lines? apparently so.

![About the [rmfo-blogs.com] service. [rmfo-blogs.com]](http://rmfo-blogs.com/images/rmfoblog.png)